|
Facts and Frequently Asked Questions about CEDAW: The Treaty for the Rights of Women Basics: What is it?
Basics: What is it?
About CEDAW: The Treaty for the Rights of Women The Treaty for the Rights of Women is the world’s most complete international agreement on basic human rights for women. Officially known as the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), it outlines standards for ratifying countries to meet in the treatment and rights of women. The treaty was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1979. As of March 1, 2009, 185 countries have ratified the Treaty for the Rights of Women. Ratification is expected in at least two more countries during 2009. Among the six other countries that have not yet ratified it are Sudan, Somalia, Iran and the United States. A. Nations that ratify the Treaty commit themselves to take concrete action to improve the status of women and end discrimination against them. The ratifying nations commit themselves to:
CEDAW and the World: Is the Treaty needed?
The Unfortunate Facts of Life for too Many Women and Girls Around the World Because millions of women and girls worldwide suffer daily violations of their human rights:
Investment in rights for girls and women is hugely cost-effective.
CEDAW: Successes around the World Ratifying countries are at different places in the advancement of women. However, this Treaty has been a powerful tool for women’s advocates in those countries to press their governments to live up to the Treaty’s terms and standards, using CEDAW Committee records and findings to document the effects of changes:
Q. Is CEDAW relevant across the many different cultures?
Because of its universal nature, CEDAW cannot be misconstrued as a “western” ideal only. The U.S. Situation: Should the United States ratify CEDAW?
Q. Why CEDAW? Why ratify now in the U.S.? A. U.S. ratification would give the United States far more leverage and credibility in the international community regarding women’s rights issues than it has now, helping women and girls around the world. International cooperation is needed to achieve women’s equality, and ratification would return the United States to its proper role as a world leader on behalf of women. As a non-ratifyer, the United States currently has no official standing to speak out on violations of women’s human rights. At the moment, abusers of women’s rights in other countries can reject U.S. criticism or calls for action on women’s behalf on grounds that the United States wants to dictate to other nations what it has not applied at home. U.S. opponents use this to claim that United States does not really care what happens to women around the world. U.S. failure to ratify looks like indifference. Despite differences in culture, religion, ethnicity and nationality, 185 governments have agreed to implement this treaty. U.S. absence from that list undermines the critical principle that women’s rights are human rights; that they are universal across all cultures, nations and religions; and that they deserve guarantees through international standards. Treaty ratification would lend the weight of America’s global power and influence to furthering women’s human rights worldwide. It would make real the U.S. promise of change for women’s benefit around the world, and it would further the U.S. and international goal of reducing global poverty, supporting economic growth and increasing democratic rule. Ratification would allow U.S. membership on the CEDAW Committee that reviews the regular reports from ratifying countries. The Committee spotlights abuses or progress made and bring global attention to women’s situation. The United States has a bipartisan tradition of support for international standards through human rights treaties: Presidents Reagan, Bush and Clinton ratified similar treaties on genocide, torture, race, and civil and political rights. The Treaty for the Rights of Women would continue that proud tradition. The status of American women could stand improvement in many ways. The United States ranks low among industrialized countries on many comparative measures of women’s well-being, such as maternal and infant mortality, health care, and women’s political participation, among others. Women who work full time still earn only 87 cents to every dollar men earn, for example. The 2008 World Economic Forum Gender Gap Report places the United States 31st in overall gender equity, and 69th in the proportion of women representatives in Congress. Q. What is the process for ratification? A. Senate consent will require a two-thirds majority – that is, 67 “yes” votes by the full United States Senate. (The House of Representatives has no role in the ratification process.) The Treaty will first be considered by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Chairman John Kerry (D-MA) is a longtime CEDAW champion, and the committee is likely to refer the treaty to the full Senate for a vote. Then the president signs the treaty, and ratification is complete. Q. How would CEDAW affect U.S. laws? A. The Treaty is “non-self-executing,” which means legislation related to it would come before Congress in the same way any other bill does. It would not authorize any action not already allowed under U.S. law. Countries can also express Reservations, Understandings or Declarations to clarify where domestic laws diverge from the Treaty. U.S. laws are generally in compliance already with the Treaty, which is also compatible with the U.S. Constitution, except where noted in the Reservations, Declarations and Understandings section. Despite language in the Treaty “mandating” various conditions, the Treaty grants no enforcement authority to the United Nations or any other body. It requires only that a ratifying country report periodically to the UN CEDAW Committee on recent actions taken, and sets up a process for reviewing those reports. (See “How Does the Treaty Work?” above.) The Committee is made up of 23 independent experts appointed by ratifying governments for four-year terms. Its reviews include formal “Conclusions” or recommendations on ways a country can move forward on women’s equality. They would spotlight U.S. best practices and assess where we can do better. CEDAW supporters President Barack Obama has expressed firm support for Treaty ratification. Vice President Joseph Biden was a leader in the drive for ratification when he was chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, where the Treaty has twice won bipartisan approval. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has also urged ratification, as has United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice. Millions of women, men, girls and boys support the Treaty through the more than 200 U.S. religious, civic, and community organizations that make up a Working Group seeking ratification. They include the American Bar Association, American Nurses Association, Amnesty International, National Education Association, National Coalition of Catholic Nuns, The United Methodist Church, and the YWCA. Click here for the full list. In addition, a bipartisan consensus of U.S. voters has consistently supported human rights for women, showing overwhelming support for efforts to secure the rights of women and girls.
*The other four Conventions are on Civil and Political Rights; on Elimination of Racial Discrimination; on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; and Against Torture.
| ||||||||